Churchill and Orwell

Churchill and Orwell

The Fight for Freedom

Book - 2017
Average Rating:
Rate this:
A "dual biography of Winston Churchill and George Orwell, with a focus on the pivotal years from the mid-1930s through the 1940s, when their farsighted vision and inspired action in the face of the threat of fascism and communism helped preserve democracy for the world"--
Publisher: New York :, Penguin Press,, 2017
Description: 339 pages, 16 unnumbered pages of plates : illustrations ; 25 cm
Copyright Date: ©2017
ISBN: 9781594206139
Branch Call Number: 941.084 Chu
Additional Contributors: Ricks, Thomas E. Churchill and Orwell


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment
Mar 08, 2020

" On the morning of May 10, having been informed that the Germans had begun invading Holland and Belgium, and knowing he likely would take office later that day, Churchill breakfasted on fried eggs and bacon, and then enjoyed a cigar....he was on the verge of achieving his lifelong ambition to be the prime minister of Great Britain." (May 10, 1940)

VaughanPLDavidB Dec 02, 2018

This a thoroughly enjoyable parallel history. Particularly the sections on Orwell, whose back story I did not know at all. It was an excellent introduction for me to his non-fiction works. The author struggled mightily, and unsuccessfully, to connect these two historical figures beyond the fact that they were alive at about the same time.

Apr 28, 2018

It's a nice book to read. The author did a very good job in telling us the life of Winston Churchill and George Orwell, whose life and work are still hugely relevant to us even after almost 70 years.

The good things about the book is that the author was able to look at the life of them at a distance, and thus could be free from the biases of their contemporary people. He managed to tell how they become the way they were, especially how George Orwell, a son from a middle family who went to Eton to study and never lived in a communist country, would become the author in his later years wrote the famous 1984 and Animal Farm. This is why I think the first few chapters were the most interesting and worth reading.

One thing I dislike about the book is the quotations. It is very academic work to study and quote as accurate as possible, however when most of a chapter are from quotations the book will lose its coherence. I would be better if the author have phrased them from his own words a bit and limit the quotations.

Overall I still think this is a very nice book to read.

Jan 31, 2018

Very interesting compare / contrast of these two great figures as so well commented on as above.

favouriteun Nov 24, 2017

Churchill and Orwell; an interesting comparison of two very interesting lives - their times, their vastly different backgrounds, their common fight for freedom, and their foreboding about the future - their future that is our present!
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Thomas Ricks is a recognised authority on (American) national security and foreign affairs. I found his writing informative and lucid, valuable traits when dealing with what could have been a very heavy subject.
The book does not shirk from identifying the character weaknesses in the protagonists, but treats them respectfully in balance with their great qualities. With all their human failings, they were passionate in facing totalitarian tyranny (Churchill to the Nazis and Orwell to the Spanish fascists and the Russian communists alike.)
Orwell, a socialist, upset other socialists with his frank portrayal of some of them as “faddish cranks” who pretended to be championing a better life for the poor but didn’t have a clue about what the poor really suffered. Orwell did. He lived among them for lengthy periods to experience for himself the lifestyle of the oppressed, unemployed, underpaid in both Britain and France, and wrote essays about it to inform others (“The Road to Wigan Pier”, “Down and Out in Paris”).
Though Orwell despised the British ruling class - “Whether the British ruling class are wicked or merely stupid is one of the most difficult questions of our time …”- he admired Churchill as different in some ways from his peers. He even named his hero Winston in his prophetic novel “1984”. A quote from his diary on April 28, 1941: “- with individual exceptions like Churchill, the entire British aristocracy is utterly corrupt and lacking in the most ordinary patriotism”.
Churchill was certainly born “with a silver spoon in his mouth”, but he advocated strongly for the “common” people to be recognised for their great contribution to the war effort when others of his class saw them only as cannon fodder. While Prime Minister, he sometimes slipped away from his minders, such as the time he got “lost” on a naval ship and was found in the engine room having tea and swapping yarns with the men there.
This book is both history and biography - aren’t all biographies histories? - and as such opens a window on British life in the 1930s and 40s in particular. Orwell (1903 - 1950) and Churchill (1874 - 1965) were both influential writers, passionate campaigners for freedom of thought as a necessary prerequisite for any other freedom to which nations and individuals alike might aspire. Their writings and speeches give insight to the minds of these great men and their times
A good read and a good springboard for research and further reading.

winston1 Sep 24, 2017

I found this book to be very informative. It could get a bit tedious at times but was so full of background material about Churchill and Orwell that I never knew about like Orwell intending Animal Farm as primarily a satire on the Russian Revolution. What Orwell and Churchill had in common was the issue of human freedom and moral conviction as evidenced in Churchill's role in the defeat of Hitler and Orwell's through showing the menace of authoritarian rule in Animal Farm and 1984.


Add a Quote
Dec 23, 2017

"To refuse to run with the herd is generally harder than it looks. To break with the most powerful among the herd requires unusual depth of character and clarity of mind. But it is a path we should all strive for if we are to preserve the right to think, speak, and act independently, heeding the dictates not of the state or of fashionable thought but of our own consciences. In most places and most of the time, liberty is not a product of military action. Rather ,it is something alive that grows or diminishes every day, in how we think and how we teach other in our public discourse, in what we value and reward as a society, and how we do that. Churchill and Orwell showed us the way."

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number


Subject Headings


Find it at BPL

To Top