Lord of the Flies

Lord of the Flies

DVD - 1999
Average Rating:
Rate this:
11
3
2
 …
Thirty English schoolboys are stranded on an uncharted island at the start of the "next" war. With no adults present, they quickly turn into savages.
Publisher: [Irvington, NY] : Criterion Collection, [1999]
Description: 1 videodisc (90 min.) : sd., b&w with col. sequences ; 4 3/4 in
ISBN: 9780780022089
0780022084
Branch Call Number: DVD Lord

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment
d
Derringer
Oct 15, 2018

In many ways Peter Brook's "Lord of the Flies" makes quite a disturbing statement about how naive, young boys (when left completely unsupervised by adults) will, literally, turn to absolute savages in no time flat.

Even today, 55 years later - This low-budget production still manages to pack a substantial-sized punch when you seriously consider its story's horrific implications.

Set on a deserted island in the South Pacific - "Lord of the Flies" (filmed in stark b&w) is definitely worth a view.

p
Parentfx
Apr 17, 2018

This is the Enhanced black and white version of the 1963 movie.

m
ManMachine
Jan 07, 2017

(*Most memorable movie-quote screamed out in unison by a dozen warring boys*) - "Kill! Kill! Kill!"

(Filmed on a budget of just $250,000) - I would never say that this 1963 film-adaptation of William Golding's novel (of the same name) was great movie-making.....

But, if nothing else - Lord of the Flies certainly did make quite a powerful statement about how quickly innocent children (who are completely isolated from adults) will form their own government and, ultimately, turn to savagery and cold-blooded violence without a second thought.

Filmed entirely in Puerto Rico (but its story was set on an uninhabited island in the South Pacific) - Lord of the Flies (due to its unconventional subject matter) is particularly notable for the ultra-conservative era in film-making history in which it was made.

Competently directed by UK film-maker, Peter Brook - The performances of the 30 boys cast in the film were all, pretty much, improvised. None of these boys were professional actors..... (*Watch movie-trailer*)

j
JihadiConservative
Feb 18, 2016

A so-so movie based on the book.

kevfarley Oct 24, 2013

Well worth a second look,.. especially with the 'bonus extras'. Peter Brook maintains that the path to artistic freedom and control for the Director is to have a low budget,.. and he made this masterpiece for $300K !

l
LilacBloom
May 18, 2013

I've seen both, and the 90's version is the better.
If you were born in the last 30-40 years, you'll probably enjoy the colored/remake one much better.
This? Is falsely put as the newer one, it is in fact the 60's (which I already own), not the 90's one.:(

m
Monolith
Jun 24, 2012

I'd only been familiar with the 1990 remake previously, completely unaware of this British '63 original. The film is low budget and VERY crude: camera-work; dubbed in audio (dialogue, singing, cheering, applause, etc); 'talent'. The kids were quite obviously mostly non-actors, having a blast just goofing around. Initially, they were somewhat wooden and stiff, but relaxed as the film progressed. But, despite the widespread amateurism, it deserves credit for being first. It translates William Golding's novel, however roughly, to the viewer. I guess they were a little low on cash. (lol)

m
Marcell_Murray
Jun 07, 2012

bstudent I agree! the old movies rock! :)

b
bstudent
Mar 27, 2012

drama-original black and white and very well done both filming and acting. the remake has nothing on this but color.

h
hur74Vety
Jun 12, 2010

A very dark, chilling allegory about the true nature of humans.

View All Comments

Quotes

Add a Quote
m
Monolith
Jun 24, 2012

Ralph: "His name's not Fatty. It's Piggy."

m
Monolith
Jun 24, 2012

Jack: "We've got to have rules and obey them. After all, we're not savages. We're English! And the English are best at everything!"

m
Marcell_Murray
Jun 07, 2012

"MY SPECS!"-Hilarious :D

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability
a
anna_fvrl
Feb 21, 2019

anna_fvrl thinks this title is suitable for 12 years and over

y
yellow_antelope_89
May 26, 2016

yellow_antelope_89 thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 69 and 59

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at BPL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top