The Pseudoscience Wars

The Pseudoscience Wars

Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe

Book - 2012
Average Rating:
Rate this:
"Properly analyzed, the collective mythological and religious writings of humanity reveal that around 1500 BC, a comet swept perilously close to Earth, triggering widespread natural disasters and threatening the destruction of all life before settling into solar orbit as Venus, our nearest planetary neighbor. Sound implausible? Well, from 1950 until the late 1970s, a huge number of people begged to differ, as they devoured Immanuel Velikovsky's major best-seller, Worlds in Collision, insisting that perhaps this polymathic thinker held the key to a new science and a new history. Scientists, on the other hand, assaulted Velikovsky's book, his followers, and his press mercilessly from the get-go. In [this book] Michael D. Gordin resurrects the largely forgotten figure of Velikovsky and uses his strange career and surprisingly influential writings to explore the changing definitions of the line that separates legitimate scientific inquiry from what is deemed bunk, and to show how vital this question remains to us today. ... "--Book jacket.
Publisher: Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2012
Description: x, 291 p. ; 24 cm
ISBN: 9780226304427
Branch Call Number: 523.2 Gor


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment

Jul 18, 2013

A fascinating and well-written case study in the History & Philosophy of Science, Gordin does a great job of presenting one of the more curious publishing controversies of the mid-20th Century. Using this one case to illustrate broader issues of defining what is and is not "science", the book examines the role of the public and state in science-related debates. The truth of Velikovsky's claims being beside the point, Gordin is remarkably neutral and polite even as he indirectly makes it clear that Velikovsky was basically a crank. Late in the book, he wonders why concerns about the use of science were focused on fringe elements like this or parapsychology, rather than the risks to public well-being caused by, for example, corporate-funded "research" designed to confuse the public about scientifically established links between tobacco and cancer. Ultimately, Gordin questions the very term "pseudoscience" as little more than a rhetorical move.

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Subject Headings


Find it at BPL

To Top